aboutbeyondlogin

exploring and collecting history online — science, technology, and industry

advanced

Whewell-Mill Debate in a Nutshell

Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 11/08/2007 - 20:21.
  • Early Modern (15th-18th Century)
  • Personal
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Secondary Source
URL: 

http://philosophy.wisc.edu/forster/220/whewell.html

Author: 
Malcolm R. Forster and Ann Wolfe
Excerpt: 

What is induction? John Stuart Mill (1874, p. 208) defined induction as the operation of discovering and proving general propositions. William Whewell (in Butts, 1989, p. 266) agrees with Mill’s definition as far as it goes. Is Whewell therefore assenting to the standard concept of induction, which talks of inferring a generalization of the form "All As are Bs" from the premise that "All observed As are Bs"? Does Whewell agree, to use Mill’s example, that inferring "All humans are mortal" from the premise that "John, Peter and Paul, etc., are mortal" is an example of induction? The surprising answer is "no". How can this be?

Echo is a project of the Center for History and New Media, George Mason University
© Copyright 2008 Center for History and New Media